Direct amendments at conference to NPF documents
The Labour Party Rule Book 2003, Section A, Chapter 3 - Party Conference, Subsection 3C Procedural rules for party conference, Conference rule 2 - Agenda
Paragraph 3C2.
3 reads as follows:
1
All
affiliated organizations and CLPs may submit
2
one motion on
a topic which is either not
3
substantively
addressed in the reports to
4
conference of
either the NPF or the NEC or
5
which has
arisen since the publication of those
6
reports. The CAC shall determine whether the
7
motions meet
these criteria and submit all
8
issues
received to a priorities ballot at the start
9
of
conference. Motions must be in writing
, on
10
one subject
only, or be in the form of a
11
constitutional amendment and must be received
12
by the
General Secretary at the offices of the
13
party by the
closing date determined by
14
the NEC.
Add at end: “In a year when conference is considering
the final stage
documents
from the National Policy Forum, and as an alternative to submitting either a motion (as defined in
this subsection) or a constitutional amendment, CLPs and affiliated
organizations may submit, for debate and voting at Conference, one amendment to
the material set out in the final stage document.”
Supporting arguments: The Partnership in Power rule changes introduced in 1997 substantially
reduced the opportunities for members’ participation in Labour’s policy making
process. Until this year a motion on a
subject not covered in the National
Policy Forum (NPF) or the NEC reports did not get a hearing unless
supported by 50 per cent of CLP delegates.
At the 2003 Conference a rule change submitted by East Devon CLP,
Islington North CLP, and Faversham & Mid Kent CLP, and carried primarily
thanks to the support it received from trade union delegates now gives CLPs the
right to debate four subjects of their choice.
But most policy proposals are still decided by the National Policy Forum
where CLPs and affiliated trade unions are under-represented. It has so far produced hardly any “minority
reports” which, in theory, would be voted on at conference. For this to happen support from about 35 NPF
delegates (out of 176) is needed. The rule change we are proposing would allow
CLPs and affiliated organizations to amend NPF reports at Conference if they
chose to forgo their right to submit a “contemporary” motion or a
constitutional amendment.
Closing
date for constitutional amendments is 11 June