Please
note: Even though SMG have some problems, in my opinion they serve
the Scottish people far better than a newly merged company involving
Carlton & Granada ! We don't want our Grampian/Scottish TV smashed
& regional programmes to be a thing of the past as it is elsewhere
in the regional ITV companies in England.
Scottish
Media Group (SMG) is axing 18jobs from Scottish TV, raising
staff fears about the company's commitment to ITV regional output.
The Scottish
media company - which owns the STV and Grampian ITV licences - is
cutting 11 posts from the STV studios, five producer-directors and
two admin staff.
SMG is
also planning to complete production of STV regional features programming
for 2002 by April and not begin work on output for 2003 until October,
according to the broadcasting union, Bectu.
This will
allow the company to save money by mothballing some of its Glasgow
studio space for six months.
The cuts
in STV regional programming staff comes on top of 95 redundancies
announced by SMG in October across its TV and publishing operations.
"This development
is very worrying from the point of view of SMG's responsibilities for broadcasting
in Scotland," a Bectu spokeswoman said.
"They
will meet their minimum quota for regional programming, but they have been
making more than this minimum," she added.
"It has
to be bad for viewers in Scotland if we're going to see some kind
of reduction."
But an
SMG spokeswoman dismissed any suggestion the proposed job cuts would
adversely affect STV's regional output.
"These
proposals reflect the changing needs of the business," she said.
"We do
have a period of non-utilisation coming up in our studios, but they
have never had 100% utilisation," the spokeswoman added.
"Changing
methods in studio production mean that some of the programmes that
might in the past have been made in a large studio can now be done
in a smaller news studio."
She said
it was hoped the cuts could be achieved through voluntary redundancies
and that the company would try to relocate all staff affected to
other jobs.
Action threat at Scottish TV
Members at Scottish TV and subsidiary Grampian could
go on strike as the company tears up union agreements.
A site meeting in Aberdeen on 20 January, has already
called for a strike ballot in protest at company plans to cut wages
of some staff by up to £10,000 a year. A further meeting in
Glasgow on 25 January is expected to vote the same way. Days before
the Aberdeen meeting the union was given notice by Scottish of the company's
intention to withdraw from collective agreements on wages and conditions.
The company made the move in order to impose a pay cut on more than 100
"red-ringed" staff whose salaries are still paid in accordance with a
previous wage agreement.
All of the staff affected were given protected status
when the wage agreement was re-negotiated in the early 90s to allow
new staff to join below the rates which applied at the time. They
have now been given less than a month to decide whether to accept the
pay cuts which take their wages down to the new staff rate, or opt for
a severance package and leave their jobs.
BECTU has challenged this deadline on the grounds that
the "red-ringing" arrangement is covered by the union's collective
agreement with Scottish which requires three months notice of termination.
Scottish TV in fact served the necessary three months
notice on the collective agreement at the same time as warning the
union about the threatened pay cuts on 18 January. New wage rates
provided by consultants Towers Perrin were presented with the explanation
that they were "market median" rates for the industry.
The company also took the opportunity to announce that
all in-house TV directors would be made redundant and replaced by
freelancers, and that there would be significant reductions in the
number of staff producers.
Scottish has been in the news recently after purchasing
Chris Evans' Ginger Group for more than £200 million. Observers
believe that the move was opposed by Granada Media Group, which has
been building up a stake in Scottish as part of the take-over manoeuvring
going on in ITV between the four top companies.
BECTU has warned Scottish that the management's proposals
are unacceptable, and has called for an extension to the notice
period being given to the "red-ring" staff. Further discussion may
take place after the Glasgow meeting on 25 January, however the union
believes that the company has ignored the agreed procedure for handling
disputes. This would leave the union legally free to go ahead with an
industrial action ballot without further negotiations.
Row over Grampian redundancies
Grampian TV has been accused of bad faith by BECTU
(Trade Union) and Scottish politicians after announcing job cuts.
Only two staff are affected, both of them Producer/Directors
who have been issued with redundancy notices, but BECTU has challenged
top-level executives at the company because the sackings are seen
as a deliberate breach of the collective agreement covering job cuts.
Politicians have also reacted angrily to the announcement,
fearing that the sacking of the two last remaining staff in Producer/Director
posts will prevent Grampian from fulfilling its licence obligation
to make quality programmes in the North of Scotland.
Aberdeen-based Grampian is owned by Scottish Media
Group (SMG), which also owns Scottish TV, and the union believes that the
two redundancies breach promises made by SMG when they took over the company.
BECTU officials were hoping to meet company managers
in Glasgow early in week beginning February 21. The dispute comes
soon after a separate row over redundancies at Scottish TV.
Parliament's Culture Committee has supported safeguards
on ITV programming.
In their response to the Government's White Paper on
Communications, the Select Committee on Culture, Media, and Sport,
recommended that separate licences should be retained for ITV regional
companies, regardless of any changes that may occur in ownership of
the network
The committee also advised that the proposed single
regulator for telecoms and broadcasting, OFCOM, should set up regional
offices which would measure whether or not broadcasters generally fulfilled
their obligations to provide local programming.
In its evidence to the Committee, BECTU had argued that
the wave of takeovers in ITV had led to cutbacks in local programmes, particularly
news, and in the number of regionally-produced shows that were aired nationally.
Prior to the White Paper's publication, the union pursued
a successful complaint against Grampian TV, which was accused of delivering
fewer local programmes that the company's licence required.
The Culture Committee, chaired by Labour MP Gerald Kaufman,
also took account of the union's concerns about training in the broadcasting
industry. Noting that the industry was increasingly staffed by freelancers,
which makes it "less possible to rely on in-house training", the report came
out in favour of OFCOM "promoting training activites...proportionate...to
the service obligations and privileges of particular licenced broadcasters".
However, the Committee stopped short of full support
for training plans to be a condition of broadcasters' licences - a
measure suggested by the White Paper which was welcomed by BECTU and
Skillset, the industry training body.
A call from BECTU for the new regulatory body OFCOM
to have a separate section dealing with content issues, was partially
supported by the Committee. The report recognised the difference between
economic decisions and content regulation matters that would apply within
OFCOM, and called for the new regulator's structure to be debated by
Parliament, with a recommendation that there should be "greater lay
involvement in content regulation".
BECTU's views on control of media ownership found less
favour with Kaufman's Committee. The report rejects the union's view
that the government should keep cross-media ownership rules which limit
newspaper holdings in TV companies, and BECTU was said to be simply
supporting the status quo.
Government regulation of the Internet was also dismissed
by the Committee, who welcomed a statement from Minister Chris Smith
that there would be no new proposals for censorship or regulation.
Plans to exclude the BBC from the new regulatory framework,
supported by BECTU, were questioned by the Committee, who described
as "absurd" the argument that Parliamentary scrutiny of the Corporation
would be diminished if it were overseen by OFCOM.
The report urged that the right to approve new BBC digital
channels should be transferred from the Department of Culture, Media, and
Sport, citing Chris Smith's decision to delay a review of BBC News 24 until
after the general election as an example of political interference. Ever
since the BBC's continuous news channel began broadcasting, it has been a
favourite kicking stool for members of the Committee.
Public service broadcasting was given qualified support
by the Committee, but the report throws out BECTU's view that any
relaxation of quality and diversity obligations would lead to poorer
programming.
Instead, the report lays out three principles for PSB
- firstly, public service is not provided only by the recognised terrestrial
broadcasters, and equally, not all the output of BBC, ITV, Channel
4, and Channel 5 qualifies for the description. Secondly, the costs
of providing public service should be transparently measured, and compared
against "other means of achieving the desired ends".
Thirdly, and the most alarming for current PSB broadcasters,
is the principle that provision of public service content from "whatever
source" is more important than protecting the "privileges of certain
broadcasters".
An indication of the Committee's thinking could be evident
in a recommendation that an "access fund" should be established to encourage
new projects in the Community Radio sector. While this would be generally
welcomed if it were funded by new money, the model of public service content
being centrally funded, and sourced from a wide variety of bidders, could
be devastating if it were scaled up to embrace the entire public broadcasting
sector.
Whoever ends up making the programmes, viewers and listeners
are increasingly likely to be receiving them on digital equipment, and the
Committee's report exhorts the government to speed up the process of educating
the public about the new technology, and planning for a switchover of TV
and radio transmitters from analogue to digital.
OFCOM, said the Committee, should be responsible for
an annual audit of progress towards analogue switchoff, and a leaflet
on digital TV should be distributed to every household, followed by
a public information campaign on free-to-air channels.
The Select Committee report will now be considered by
Ministers at the DTI and DCMS, along with hundreds of submissions on the White
Paper from organisations including BECTU.
A new Communications Bill is likely to feature in the
legislative programme of the next government if Labour are re-elected,
and the proposed changes could become law within the next year.
End of the line for
ITV Digital
More than 900 staff at ITV Digital are set to lose their jobs
as the channel shuts down its pay-TV service. Another 400 jobs are threatened
in Plymouth.
And now the ITC has revoked the channel's licences after Deloitte
& Touche adminstrators failed to find a buyer. Now the firm will
look to sell off the 1.2m subscriber base.
The BBC, Channel 4, Microsoft and French broadcaster canal+
are believed to be in the bidding for the various assets of the channel.
The threatened job cuts come at a call centre in Pembroke Dock,
west Wales, and in the channel's pay-TV centre in Plymouth. Another
250 have been given their notice at the channel's Chelsea HQ.
Some of the football clubs hoping for payment of the outstanding
£178.5m from the broadcaster are now considering filing for
bankruptcy en masse. This would provide them with sufficient grounds
to cut the spiralling player wages that have added to the affair, reports
suggest.
ITV Digital owners Carlton and Granada issued the following
statement: '"The Administrators of ITV Digital have today confirmed
that they will be closing the Pay Television operation of the Company
from this evening [Tues 30 April]. Insufficient interest has been shown
from prospective purchasers to justify a continuation of the operation.
The free to air channels will continue in the short term whilst
the Administrators pursue the best realisation for the value of the
assets.
The Administrators advised "It is with regret that we take
this course of action. We have made strenuous efforts initially to
restructure the cost base and latterly to sell the business and assets
but unfortunately there is no appetite in the market for a preservation
of the business as a going concern.
"Arrangements have been made for the surrender of the multiplex
licences to the ITC. We understand the ITC will issue invitations to
re-tender those licences on a more flexible basis tomorrow, Wednesday,
May 1."
They added: "We will be contacting subscribers, employees and
creditors as we move to close the administration."'
Tuesday 30th April 2002 --
by Richard Easson
ITV Digital will shut down
operations at midnight tonight, with the closure of most pay TV channels
following at 7am on Wednesday, it has been confirmed.
Administrators Deloitte and Touche will pull the plug on the
channels - including Sky One, Paramount and UK Gold - having informed
the broadcasters that it can no longer continue without a buyer.
Barring an eleventh-hour lifeline, hundreds of thousands of
subscribers will now be left with just the free-to-air channels offered
by the likes of the BBC and ITV in the short term.
Pre-empting the news earlier this afternoon, it emerged 900
workers are to lose there jobs at the operator's Pembroke-based call
centre.
In a statement from Deloitte and Touche confirming the closure
at midnight and the job losses at Pembroke, it has also been confirmed
that 400 jobs at the Plymouth call centre will also go.
"The Administrators of ITV Digital have today confirmed that
they will be closing the Pay Television operation of the Company from
this evening," it said. "Insufficient interest has been shown from prospective
purchasers to justify a continuation of the operation. The free to air
channels will continue in the short term whilst the Administrators pursue
the best realisation for the value of the assets."
Carlton Sacks Workers
Carlton Television was today accused of 'sucking jobs
out of the Midlands' as it axed staff at its Birmingham studios.
The broadcasting company admitted it was eliminating six full-time
posts in its presentation and scheduling operations in Birmingham and
giving the work to London. But one disillusioned worker said the new
cut was the latest in a series of blows since Carlton took over Central
about five years ago.
'The feeling is that they are sucking as much from Birmingham
as they are allowed to do and give lip service to their responsibilities
for the region.' 'Scores of jobs have gone since Carlton took Central
and they have now even taken away the branding. All they are leaving
is a vestigial remnant of what it used to be.'
A Carlton spokesman said the jobs concerned the making
of on-air announcements between programmes and adverts and broadcasting
scheduling. He said consultations were now taking place with staff
and added 'The present structure has a lot of duplication of roles,
functions and responsibilities.'
Investors Pull plug on Carlton
!
In recent months, investors have been deserting Carlton
Communications in droves. So far this year, the media group's shares
have underperformed the FTSE 100 index by 25 per cent.
Compared with other media stocks in both the UK and
continental Europe, its performance is even poorer - it is now among the
most lowly-rated media stocks in Europe.
...On the face of it, the slide is easy to explain,
so we are told ! Investors are frustrated with the fragmented ownership
of ITV, in which Carlton holds three regional franchises.
Ballot rules agreed with BSkyB
A vote on union recognition
at a BSkyB call centre is likely to start in
January.
BECTU and BSkyB management have
agreed to ground rules for the ballot, which identify the staff at the
Livingston call centre who will vote, and lay out a procedure for union
and employer to put their respective points of view to the workforce.
The secret ballot will be conducted
among BSkyB staff working in Livingston's sales department, where BECTU
has demonstrated sufficient membership to trigger a union recognition ballot.
Although BSkyB declined an invitation
to recognise BECTU voluntarily, the union and management have mutually
agreed to the ballot procedure without having to refer back to the government-appointed
Central Arbitration Council (CAC), which oversees cases where employers
contest claims for union recognition.
If no agreement had been reached
on the range of staff to be balloted - the "bargaining unit" in industrial
relations language - then the CAC would have adjudicated after hearing
arguments from union and management.
Instead, BSkyB and BECTU have
agreed that Livingston sales staff represent a bargaining unit, and, once
the date for a secret ballot has been fixed, there will be a formula for
union and management to have access to the staff involved in the vote.
Under the terms of the voluntary
agreement struck between BECTU and BSkyB, both parties have promised to
avoid negative campaigning against each other, and any hostile comments
made during the earlier recognition campaign will be withdrawn.
The agreement has led to BECTU
editing a number of items on this website.
BECTU is hoping that the secret
ballot on union recognition will begin before the end of January 2003.
Scottish Media heads for strike
Union stewards at Scottish Media Group are due
to announce dates for industrial action.
No progress has been made towards resolving a dispute
over pay and redundancies since BECTU members at Scottish
and Grampian TV voted for strike action.
In a postal ballot last month 83% of Glasgow-based
SMG members voted for industrial action, which was also supported
by 81% of BECTU members at Grampian.
Turnout in Glasgow was 69%, while a record
89% of Grampian members took part in the ballot.
The dispute began with SMG's decision to impose a 2%
pay increase without agreement in January this year, a figure well
below inflation.
Discussions with SMG failed to resolve the dispute,
and feelings were inflamed by the subsequent announcement of redundancies
at Grampian.