|
Evidence provided to Archaeological Survey of India and Prime Minister
goes unheeded.
Hereunder is reproduced a brief copy of text from the original letter
to the A.S.I.
Dr M.S Nagaraja
October
3 1984
Director General
Archaelogical survey of India
New Delhi
Dear Mr Nagaraja I am an archiect and an architectural historian. My
seciality is the application of scientific dating to ancient monuments...
I have been concerned with the Taj mahal for a number oy years May I suggest
you consider the possibility of my coming backfor a week. The harm to
the monument will be infinitesimal.
The basic investigation would be of brick samples
taken from perhaps 20 locations .
The results would be reliable within 100 years on ether side.......
Prof Marvin H Mills
The reply hereunder
Shri Marvin H Mills A.I.A 21
Nov 1984
The Taj Mahal is well dated on documentary evidence, Moreover BARC, Mumbai
and Physical Research Lab in Ahemdabad are also seized of the problem
and it is not considered desirable to have any further investigation
Yours faithfully,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA, JANPATH, NEW DELHI
|