The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust

Using Computers
in American Primary Schools

Information & Communications Technology (ICT)

Leaves001.jpg (187845 bytes)

Technology Plans

Many schools and school districts have already produced ‘Tech Plans’ which address the main issues involved in computer education. These plans are central to the development of computer use in schools and in many cases are requirements linked to the provision of funding and/or other resources.

Typically a Tech Plan will include the following elements:

  • A statement of Learning Goals (linked to State and Federal Technology goals)

  • Strategies for assessment and evaluation

  • A staff development strategy

  • Hardware, Networking and Telecommunications

  • Software

  • Support Systems

  • Funding

In simple terms The Tech Plan describes:

  • What children should know, understand or be able to do.

  • How a school will know if successful teaching and learning has taken place.

  • The infrastructure required to make this possible.

Kimball Kindergarten

Kimball school staff and students will use technology to support lifelong learning and to meet academic standards. All members of the Kimball community will use technology for researching information, producing and presenting projects and communicating with the wider world.”

From the Kimball Elementary School Tech Plan

Schools and Districts had access to a great deal of advice and guidance to help them prepare their tech plans. In Kelso District for example a development group had been formed to produce a plan which in turn would inform school plans. The group included class teachers, school principals, technology specialists and senior members of the District’s management team including representatives with responsibilities for finance, buildings and equipment. This was a very effective mix as it guaranteed that all aspects required for the successful implementation of computer education could be addressed in a co-ordinated way. The inclusion of school-based staff also resulted in some very excellent staff development and certainly facilitated the creation of tech plans in the schools represented.

Educational Service District 112 offered Kelso schools considerable support via courses, consultancy and documentary guidance. Much of this had been posted on the Internet in a variety of formats such as Powerpoint presentations, template files and Adobe Acrobat documents (.pdf files). An online database had been created to record any school’s inventory of hardware. This is managed at District level and schools are only required to complete and then maintain an existing data set. Video-Conferencing was also used regularly as a means of communication. I was most impressed by one conference between the Service District and 26 School districts – high-quality information presented with excellent technical quality and no technical glitches!!

Tech plans are designed to clarify learning goals and the infrastructure required to deliver these. They also communicate very clearly the expectations and obligations of each level of the system. Scottish schools would certainly benefit from such an integrated approach.

Funding

ICT is funded in a wide variety of ways:

  • Federal Funding: the United States Department of Education funds ICT via a range of national programmes such as Technology Innovation Challenge Grants, the Technology Literacy Challenge Fund and Learning Anytime Anywhere Partnerships. A national budget for these programmes of almost $3 billion was set for 2000. Washington State’s share of this was $33.6 million.

  • State Funding: core funding for schools related to student roll is provided by the State and ICT receives a portion of this. In addition Washington State has introduced a range of specific programmes such as the Teldec Grant programme. (see Appendix 5)

  • District Funding: a school district has the right to raise extra money for schools via a local levy which is added to local taxes.

  • Private Funding: a great many grants are available from organisations such as The Gates Foundation.

In addition to the above there are a variety of ways in which funding is provided in kind. These include:

  • ‘e-rate’: schools enjoy cheap internet access because of the e-rate where up to $2.25 billion annually is available to provide a discounted telecommunications services to schools and libraries. Discounts range from 20% to 90%, depending on economic need and location. The level of discount is based upon the percentage of students eligible for participation in the federal free and reduced price school lunch programme. Each school district must have an approved Tech Plan to be able to access e-rate.

  • Donated Computers Scheme: this scheme encourages businesses and industry to donate used computers to schools. Considerable concern was expressed by a number of school-based staff about this initiative as they felt that the computers concerned were often older and less powerful than new models.

  • Other Donated Technology: a number of companies also donated other materials and equipment. For example, Hewlett Packard had given approximately 35 palettes of donated items to schools in the ESD 112 area over a six-month period. This had an estimated value of $2,646,000 and included items such as ink cartridges, transparencies and printer paper.

  • Other Services: schools received free or at reduced cost a variety of services such as technical support, repairs and training from School Districts and Educational Service Districts. Washington State had also negotiated a number of contracts with hardware and software suppliers to provide discounted hardware and software to schools.

Hardware

All schools I visited had similar arrangements for hardware provision:

  • Most computers in each school were networked and had Internet access.

  • Nearly all schools had at least one computer lab with about 30 machines.

  • Most schools had a library with a number of computers available for use by children.

  • Other computers were dispersed in classrooms throughout the school.

  • Most schools had a mixture of PC and Apple Macintosh computers. These co-existed quite happily although there were issues surrounding file compatibility, software provision and training.

There was considerable diversity in the age and models of computers. These ranged from brand new Pentium 3 PCs to 10 year old Apple LCIIs. It was interesting to note that older Apple computers had borne the test of time rather better than their PC counterparts!

Classroom Computers

Some classrooms where the class teacher had been awarded a grant were exceptionally well resourced. Grants had been awarded mainly by the Gates Foundation and TELDEC (Technology and the Essential Learnings Developing Effective Classrooms). For more details of Gates and TELDEC grants see Appendices 5 & 6.

A typical Gates Grant or Teldec classroom will receive 1 computer per four children, a laptop computer for teacher use, a software bundle, a digital camera, a digital video camera, a scanner, an inkjet printer, a zip drive, a floppy drive, a data projector, a document camera/reader, VCR and monitor.

However this created significantly different levels of provision within any school. It was not unusual for children to transfer from a grant classroom with a very high level of provision to another with a single computer. This issue had been recognised and at all levels there were considerable efforts being made to redress this imbalance both via additional resource provision and by providing a range of training and pedagogical support for teachers in classrooms with limited hardware.

This diversity also challenged some of my assumptions about pupil/computer ratios. These ratios are normally based on a simple sum ie the number of pupils in the school divided by the number of ‘countable’ machines. The result may sound attractive but it is only a notional ratio as many of a school’s computers are not accessible to all pupils all the time. Children only have limited access to teachers’ machines and communal machines (eg in the library or computer lab) yet these machines are invariably counted in the overall ratio. This is unhelpful as it can disguise very differing levels of access within any school.

Many classrooms were not ideally suited to accommodate computers. Room size and suitability of furniture were major issues. Many teachers had not considered aspects such as ideal location, the height of computer furniture and cable management. In most cases computers were placed together in a group at one end of the room.

Technical Support, Repairs and Maintenance

Arrangements for this area were rather ad hoc and schools relied heavily on support from their own tech specialists and from district staff. In one Seattle school a student from the University of Washington had been appointed on a part-time basis.

Training

Training is provided at State, Service District and School District levels. A wide variety of types of training was available ranging from skills-based training in specific packages to the application of ICT in the curriculum. Although many different courses were available these fell into 4 main categories:

  • Integrating Technology in the Curriculum

  • Internet-related training eg accessing the Internet, creating web pages, using e-mail

  • Multimedia applications eg Powerpoint, Hyperstudio, Kidpix

  • Skills-based training in specific applications eg Word, Excel

Tech Specialists in schools provided some training for other staff. This often took place in after-school sessions. Longer courses were offered by school districts and service districts. Summer Schools were also available.

Training was also delivered via many of the grants which were available. See Appendix 5: The TELDEC Grant for more information.

 Continue..............